Intro
(General facts)
Gone are the days when women used to work with in the four walls of the house. Nowadays they are showing their mettle in every field and proving second to none. Even the armed forces are not an exception and this makes the issue highly debatable.
(Paraphrasing)
Some individuals opine that women’s role in armed forces should be equivalent of men. In sharp contrast, some people tend to believe that women are a complete misfit in these forces, hence should not be given entry in armed forces.
(Thesis statement)
I would like to delve into both the arguments before forming an opinion.
Body para-1 (first/ former View)
(Main Idea)
Going with the first school of thought, women should have the similar rights as men to choose their profession as we are living in an egalitarian society where everyone has equal rights regardless of their gender, caste, creed or background.
(Supporting idea)
People should be chosen for jobs based on their skills, qualification and character. For example, if a woman has enough ability to join armed forces, she should be welcome to become a soldier or a police officer. Gender should not come in the way of the selection process.
Body para-2(Second/latter view)
The opposite school of thought, however, deems that because women lack physical strength, they are not fit to be in the army or police as these jobs require physical strength.
(Extending idea)
They further elaborate that naturally women are not as physically strong as men. Since armed forces are very demanding and require high intensity physical work, women might not be able to cope up with new challenges emerging from different critical and dangerous situations.
(Your opinion)
1. However, according to me, the argument of physical strength holds no ground. I would argue that police and military jobs are not just about physical strength. In fact, they require more than that. For example, teamwork, leadership, strategic planning and communication are also equally important skills. Numerous studies have proved that women have a slight edge over men in controlling a situation by communicating more effectively.
2. Moreover, as far as the physical strength is concerned, it can also be amplified by effective workouts and muscle training.
Conclusion
(Concluding statement and restating opinion)
In conclusion, I would like to believe that without being biased women should be given equal opportunities in armed forces as men.
(Suggestion)
It is high time that we start believing in the female counterparts and give them a fair chance to prove their worth in armed forces before drawing any sort of conclusion.
(General facts)
Gone are the days when women used to work with in the four walls of the house. Nowadays they are showing their mettle in every field and proving second to none. Even the armed forces are not an exception and this makes the issue highly debatable.
(Paraphrasing)
Some individuals opine that women’s role in armed forces should be equivalent of men. In sharp contrast, some people tend to believe that women are a complete misfit in these forces, hence should not be given entry in armed forces.
(Thesis statement)
I would like to delve into both the arguments before forming an opinion.
Body para-1 (first/ former View)
(Main Idea)
Going with the first school of thought, women should have the similar rights as men to choose their profession as we are living in an egalitarian society where everyone has equal rights regardless of their gender, caste, creed or background.
(Supporting idea)
People should be chosen for jobs based on their skills, qualification and character. For example, if a woman has enough ability to join armed forces, she should be welcome to become a soldier or a police officer. Gender should not come in the way of the selection process.
Body para-2(Second/latter view)
The opposite school of thought, however, deems that because women lack physical strength, they are not fit to be in the army or police as these jobs require physical strength.
(Extending idea)
They further elaborate that naturally women are not as physically strong as men. Since armed forces are very demanding and require high intensity physical work, women might not be able to cope up with new challenges emerging from different critical and dangerous situations.
(Your opinion)
1. However, according to me, the argument of physical strength holds no ground. I would argue that police and military jobs are not just about physical strength. In fact, they require more than that. For example, teamwork, leadership, strategic planning and communication are also equally important skills. Numerous studies have proved that women have a slight edge over men in controlling a situation by communicating more effectively.
2. Moreover, as far as the physical strength is concerned, it can also be amplified by effective workouts and muscle training.
Conclusion
(Concluding statement and restating opinion)
In conclusion, I would like to believe that without being biased women should be given equal opportunities in armed forces as men.
(Suggestion)
It is high time that we start believing in the female counterparts and give them a fair chance to prove their worth in armed forces before drawing any sort of conclusion.
The new casino is open | DrmCD
ReplyDelete› usa › 강원도 출장마사지 the-new-casino › usa 강릉 출장마사지 › the-new-casino This week we bring you some of the 태백 출장샵 hottest slots we'll ever 광주 출장샵 unveil, from the hottest slots to 서귀포 출장안마 the newest table games!