Environmental problems such as pollution and climatic variations are increasing nowadays. The governments have taken some measures at a global level. But they got only few solutions. Why is it so? How can this problem be solved?

Environmental problems such as pollution and climatic variations are increasing
nowadays. The governments have taken some measures at a global level. But they
got only few solutions. Why is it so? How can this problem be solved?



Saving the environment has become the top priority across the world. No country in the world disagrees
with the fact that the Earth is at the brink of a climatic disaster, but the measures taken neither have legs
nor the lengths to address the issue. This essay intends to look into why the measures have always fallen
short of the mark, and suggest some solutions to mitigate the problem.



The first reason why global measures have failed is that the developed world is shying away from the
burden it needs to bear for the damage it did to the environment in the colonial industrial revolution
times. Hence we are stuck in a limbo of bipolar world of developing nations on one side and the
developed on the other. And the compromises reached between the two have always been far from
satisfactory. If we need to see a real positive change, the developed world has to do more than the
developing world. It cannot just say that everyone should play an equal role. It can do so by providing
wealth and technology related to renewable sources of energy to the developing and the least developed
countries.



The second major reason of not being able to do for the environment is that our governments are acting
in the interests of powerful lobbies and corporations. For example, the fossil fuel industries are trillion
dollar businesses. If clean energy succeeds, these giants would lose. The clout of these is so strong that
instead of acting with ambition and urgency, the governments are making feeble efforts. The solution, for
this would be to create awareness that fossil fuel industries have to step down to let the greener energies
succeed.



Finally, development and environment are always seen at loggerheads with each other. Environment
always ends up taking a back seat to development. Thus, looking at the two as separate entities has
delayed and brought us to our current position. The answer to this is sustainable development, which is
development that meets the needs of the present, without compromising the environment.



To sum up, it can be seen clearly, why the steps taken so far have failed to save the environment.
However, the time has come to do some soul-searching and take pro-active steps for the environment.

Format of advantage/ disadvantage essays

Intro

(General Facts)
It goes without saying that ……………………...
Or  It is implicit/ irrefutable that......

(Paraphrasing)

(Thesis Statement)
1. This essay would delve in to both the benefits and drawbacks of such a measure.
2. I would like to explicate the pros and cons of it at length in the paragraphs to come.
3. This essay would explore the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomena.

Body – Para 1

(Main Idea)
1. The main advantage is….
For example…….

(Supporting idea)
What is more, …………………………………………………………….
For Example………

Body – Para 2

(Main idea)
However it has a downside as well. The first drawback is …………………………
For example…..

(Supporting idea 4)
Apart frm that,………………………………
For example……


Conclusion

(Concluding statement and restating opinion)
In the end,it can be concluded that…….
To put in a nutshell, I pen down saying that…..
After looking at both sides of the coin/issue, it can be concluded that…..

(Suggestion)………..

Pollution and other environmental problems are resulting from a country's developing and becoming richer. Some think this cannot be avoided. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Intro
(General facts)
It goes without saying that pollution and other environmental problems posing a serious threat to human existence. All the things that human beings have designed and devised for comfort have some kind of repercussion for the environment.

(Paraphrasing)
A generally accepted theory is that this damage to environment is inevitable and inescapable
However, I disagree that this cannot be avoided. Fortunately technology has advanced enough that environmental damage is no longer essential for further progress.

(Thesis statement)
Therefore, I tend to believe that growing pollution can be tamed. I would like to explicate it at length/ comprehensively in the paragraphs to come.



Body – Para 1
1. It is implicit that in the quest for development, man has harmed the environment quite considerably. Global warming and its repercussions are now an open secret.  Most of the energy that we use is polluting the environment. Effluents from large factories are being dumped and landfill sites are filling up with non-biodegradable wastes.

2. Nevertheless, I still feel that the damage to the environment is revertible.  For instance, we know that there are renewable sources of energy which are lesser polluting. People should be made aware and educated about the use of renewable sources as they are not used on a large scale because of the lack of awareness among masses. Although, some people have already started designing houses which do not require air conditioning even in the extremes of temperature. For example, they are using prefabricate material such as aluminum for doors and windows.

Body Para 2
3. I feel that if there is awareness, we can achieve progress in its true meaning and without losing any single bit of our environment.  The answer lies in the green technologies which increasingly use renewable resources of energy.

4. We should also remember the three “Rs” - reduce, reuse and recycle. Not only, we have to reduce the use of nonrenewable sources like coal or natural gas. We also have to focus on the reuse and recycle of no degradable items like plastic. In this way we can achieve an ecologically sustainable development.

Conclusion
(Concluding statement and restating opinion)
To put it in a nutshell, I pen down saying that, earlier we could say that - Industrial growth = Progress = Environmental Damage; but fortunately technology has moved far enough that environmental damage is no longer required for further advancement.
(Suggestion)
The onus lies on individuals as well to act more responsibly so that future generation can have a safer planet to live. Sustainable development is indeed the need of the hour.

Some developing countries invite large foreign companies to open offices and factories in order to help their economy. However, some people feel that foreign companies should be shut out and instead the government should help the local companies to contribute to the economic growth. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Intro
(General facts & paraphrasing)
It is ostensible that in the era of globalization, inviting multinational companies to set up offices and factories has become a common and unprecedented practice among developing nations nowadays.  Though, it is a highly debatable whether these international companies or whether the local companies should be promoted by the governments of developing countries.

(Thesis Statement)
I deem that MNCs are good for the overall health of economy hence should be promoted. Also, the governments need to make local companies competent enough to survive in the cut-throat competition.  I would like to explicate it at length in the paragraphs to come.

Body – Para 1
1. MNCs bring lot of advantages. To begin, they provide employment to local people which help in addressing the problem of unemployment in the host country. Also, they usually pay better remunerations than other available opportunities. Apart from that, they train local labour with more sophisticated techniques which in the long run bring benefits to the host country.

2. Moreover, they assist in boosting the growth rate of host nation by introducing new technology and investment. In addition to it, they promote production and bring a variety of products to the market.

3. Furthermore, such MNCs encourage the growth of various supporting industries.  For example, if an MNC opens in a place, then many businesses open in the neighbourhood, which cater to the workers working in these MNCs. In this way, they stabilize and stimulate local economies, and lift the standards of living.

Body – Para 2
4. Another important advantage of MNCs is that they induce their local rivals to become more innovative and competitive. Taking an example, it is a well known fact that Indian company Videocon has improved its standard to compete with MNCs such as Samsung and Sony.

5. Last but not the least, these companies develop positive values for women such as diversity, and equality. Women are given equal opportunities in these companies without any prejudice or being biased.

(Downside)
However, MNCs do have a downside. For instance, local small scale industries might not be able to compete with these multinationals as they have limited resources. Therefore, the govt. should support them so that they can rub shoulders with these MNCs.

Conclusion
(Concluding statement and restating opinion)
To put it in a nutshell, I pen down saying that MNCs are largely beneficial for the growth of under developing nations.

(Suggestion)
They may have some drawbacks; however that should not stop us from appreciating and admiring their countless benefits. They should be promoted by the governments of developing countries as they might put much needed impetus in the otherwise dying economy.

Some people say that professional workers such as doctors, nurses and teachers who make greater contribution to the society should be paid more than those people in the field of sports and entertainment. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Intro
(General Facts)
The high incomes of celebrities in the field of sports and entertainment have always been a matter of dispute and highly debatable.

(Paraphrasing)
Despite their significant contribution to the society, a group of individuals believe that professional workers like doctors, nurses and teachers should be getting higher salaries than these celebrities because of the larger contribution they make to the society.

(Thesis Statement)
However, I tend to think in the opposite direction. I deem that doctors, nurses and teachers should not be paid more than these celebrities. I have some solid grounds to defend my point of view.

Body – Para 1
1. To begin, it is implicit that doctors, nurses and teachers are making a huge contribution to society.         However, the contribution of these celebrities is also second to none.  They provide us entertainment and inspiration. Moreover, they bring name and fame to our country. They are role models for the society and people follow them and listen to them.

2. To add to it, they have a very short career span. Most of the people in the sports and entertainment field start their career at the age of 19-20 and retire by 33-35 years. Whatever these celebrities earn is during these few years and after that they face struggle. Of course, there are exceptions such as the great legend Amitabh Bachhan but such examples can be counted on finger tips. On the flip side, a doctor, teacher or nurse does not ever retire if he does not wish to.
For example, my uncle is a doctor and even at the age of 74 he goes to his clinic for two hours every day.

Body – Para 2
3. What is more, these celebrities sacrifice their personal life completely .They cannot enjoy the common things of life like the common man does. They are always followed by the paparazzi and their children too always need security. This is too much price to pay for the high salaries they receive.

4. Finally, people with natural abilities and special talents are exceptional individuals. For example, not everyone has the natural gift of dancing, acting or playing a certain game with a complete command. Therefore, these people need extra attention or special care. High salaries can be a big boost and fitting reward to their potential.

Conclusion
In the end, it can be concluded that high earnings of people in the field of sports and entertainment is completely justified.

(Opinion and suggestion)
Their services to the society are as imperative as the services of doctors, teachers and nurses if not more. No doubt, professional workers need to be given better remunerations but not at the cost of high income of celebrities.

Although nowadays people are reading news through internet, newspapers still remain of value. Do you agree or disagree.

Intro
(General Facts)
It is irrefutable that the rise of the Internet has brought sea changes in the field of information and technology.

(Paraphrasing)
Internet is making serious inroads in people’s news reading habits. Lot of people now use internet to get the latest updates about the world around.

(Thesis Statement)
However, I tend to believe that in spite of facing a serious challenge from internet, newspaper still holds its position firmly. A number of arguments can be presented to defend my opinion.

Body – Para 1
1. The first argument in favour of the newspaper is that it does not require any sophisticated technical equipment to read. This offers the reader a high level of flexibility. The printed newspaper can basically be read in any place at any time.  For instance, a person may read the paper while commuting to and from work and also the reader can absorb the information at his own pace.

2. Furthermore, local information such as local news, movies and entertainment in the local area, local sporting and other events are best assessed through the printed newspaper. To add to it, the newspapers also have advertisements for stores having sales. Readers always want to know about things closest to home and no other medium is better than a newspaper in supplying this information.

Body – Para 2
3. Finally, in many parts of the world people still do not have access to a computer and internet connection as compare to a newspaper which is as common as dirt. A newspaper can be found almost everywhere. It is one of the cheapest sources of information, thus, available to all and sundry

(Opposite Argument)
It is implicit that the appetite for news from the Internet is growing. The technical potential of the internet greatly surpasses that of the printed newspapers in a number of ways. Through the internet there is the possibility of regular updates, rapid access to a large number of newspapers. And being paperless it is very eco-friendly. However, the average person gets news from a variety of sources and internet is just one of them. Therefore, I believe that the printed newspaper is the king of all news media.

Conclusion
(Concluding statement and restating opinion)
To put it in a nutshell, I pen down saying that, online news has not lead to any decline in the circulation of newspaper. In fact, it is still going great guns.

(Prediction and hope)
This equation might get changed in the future. However, one would hope and imagine that printed newspaper and online newspaper would go hand in hand in the days to come.

The spread of multinational companies and the increase in globalization produce positive effects for everyone. Do you agree or disagree?

Intro
(General facts)
We are living in the era of globalization. The entire world has turned in to a ‘global village’.
The diminution/ attenuation/dwindling of barriers on trade and other economic activities has made it feasible for the multinational companies to move around freely in different nooks and corners of the world.

(Paraphrasing)
A popular stratum of society deems that this is a positive development as one and all are getting benefited out of it

(Thesis statement)
However, I tend/ am inclined to think in the opposite direction. I think it is not bringing dividends to all and sundry. I would like to explicate it at length in the paragraphs to come.

Body – Para 1
1. My major argument relates to their products. Supporters of globalization argue that multinational companies produce high quality products.  This may be true to some extent, however, it also means that people have less choice of products to buy.

2. What is more, these products are generally expensive which means an extra financial burden on the pocket of the common man. Hence, these products are not in everyone’ reach.

3. In addition, when powerful multinational companies invade/intrude local markets with their goods, they pose a serious challenge to local and small companies and often force them to go out of business. As a result, consumers have no choice but to buy multinational products whether we like them or not.

Body – Para 2
4. Moreover, MNCs and globalization are making societies more open which is good in a way but this also means that as a result the human race is losing its cultural identity.

5. Furthermore, advocates of multinational companies often point out that they provide employment.
This is undoubtedly true, it also indicates that we have become more dependent on them which means when a multinational company decides to move to another country, this has an adverse effect on its workers who lose their jobs.

6. To add to it, the jobs MNCs provide are not paid as much as they pay for similar jobs in their own country. Thus, in fact they are exploiting workers of poor nations.

Conclusion
(Concluding statement and restating the opinion)
After the overall analysis, it can be concluded that apparently multinational companies do have their benefits, but they also have their drawbacks and not everyone is benefited by them.

(Suggestion)
Globalization will prove a boon when everyone can reap the fruits of it and when the benefits are not restricted only to a group of individuals, companies or countries.